To Write or Not to Write about Fashion?
Two years ago I started writing this post but then stopped, thinking that perhaps no one would be interested in reading about children’s clothes sixty years ago. So I just left this post sitting in the draft box. It wasn’t until I started to read Flora Thompson’s memoir of her life during the 1880s in a small hamlet in Oxfordshire that I began to think again about vintage clothing. In my previous post, I described Lark Rise to Candleford, which the BBC broadcast as a series. An excerpt from Flora’s book tells us about what children wore back then:
. . . but it was difficult to keep decently covered, and that was a pity because they did dearly love what they called ‘anything a bit dressy’. This taste was not encouraged by the garments made by the girls in school from material given by the Rectory people—roomy chemises and wide-legged drawers made of unbleached calico, beautifully sewn, but without an inch of trimming; harsh, but strong flannel petticoats and worsted stockings that would almost stand up with no legs in them—although these were gratefully received and had their merits, for they wore for years and the calico improved with washing. Chapter 1
Inspired by Flora’s descriptions, I returned to compiling pictures and content for this post.
Fashionably Dressed, Yet Unaware
By looking at the way children dressed, we can discover a few clues about life in the 1950s. When I was a little girl, growing up in a working-class suburb of Philadelphia, I remember my mother dressing my sister and I in matching outfits. I couldn’t find any history about this custom, but I remembered that in the movie, The Sound of Music, Maria dressed the children in matching play clothes. Dressing children alike may be a way of cementing family kinship. My mother fostered a close relationship between my sister and I, and dressing us alike may have been part of that plan. I never minded dressing the same as my sister, but I didn’t know there was an option.
Mom selected all of our clothes, and we wore whatever she purchased for us. With play clothes, we had some degree of flexibility in picking out what we wore for the day, but for school or dress up, Mom was fully in charge. I don’t remember rebelling against her choices because clothes were not that important to me.
In our school and neighborhood, children were clean and neatly dressed. Because we came from a fairly homogenous community, there seemed to be little emphasis on clothing as fashion statements. No one dressed better than anyone else, as I recall, and we didn’t talk about clothes. I can remember on only one exception. In third grade, a girl joined our classroom in the middle of the year, and I noticed she looked disheveled. At first, I thought perhaps that just moving in created a lapse in hair and clothing care, but her appearance never improved. That one example stood out because uniformity in neatness prevailed.
Three Basic Outfits. We wore three basic outfits, always starting with white cotton underwear, including an undershirt, with short sleeves for winter and sleeveless for summer.
Play Clothes: A Hodge-Podge but Sometimes Matching. Pants, peddle pushers (pants that ended between the knee and the ankle so material would not get caught in bicycle parts), shorts, shirt or blouse, light canvas sneakers and socks. In the summer, we would wear rompers, tied with a bow at each shoulder or one-piece zippered short and shirt set. A “skort,” a very short pleated skirt with attached matching bloomers underneath was another option when the weather was warm. This was the age before the t-shirt, which we never wore. In winter, corduroy pants lined in flannel would keep us warm while sledding. As older children, we transitioned from long coats to the more practical “car coat”, which came to just below the waist, square-cut in shape and usually with an attached hood.
School Clothes: Keeping Order with Flouncy Attire. Dress or skirt, slip, socks and sturdy shoes (white and black saddlebacks) or shoes with straps or laces or Mary Janes, which was a slip-on dress shoe made of black patent leather, usually with a strap that buckled on the side. Girls’ clothes mimicked women’s fashion trends at the time: full circle skirt and a cinched waist. Full skirts were always worn with a petticoat or slip. Hemlines remained above the knee, at varying lengths.
Almost every public school in the U.S. required that girls wear dresses or skirts. I didn’t like wearing dresses because keeping modest while on the playground was a continual nuisance. Every girl knew the one rule of wearing a dress: keep it down. Also, there was a rule that your petticoat should not hang below the dress, requiring some effort yanking on straps to make the necessary adjustments. Sometimes I would slip slacks on under my dress, which was strictly against school rules and almost immediately the teacher would ask me to remove them. Girls could change into shorts or pants for gym class.
Dress Clothes: Petticoats and Mary Janes. Church, visiting or special occasions meant a complete outfit including a fancy dress, petticoat, Mary Janes, socks, coat, hat, and sometimes purse and gloves. Crinoline petticoats made the dresses flair out. In the winter, wool coats and matching leggings, usually with side zippers, would keep us warm. Coat collars were sometimes trimmed in velvet. Sunday School always required a fancy dress. Our family was not religious, but my parents must have felt that we have some religious training and dress the part. Easter brought out the best finery, including an Easter bonnet, trimmed with ribbons and silk flowers. When we were older, we wore suits for Easter.
Mom fixed our hair every morning, usually in a pony tail or left down, supported by four colored barrettes. Most nights, Mom would roll our hair in soft curlers before we went to bed. She didn’t like hair too much longer than shoulder length. For some reason, I hated having my hair cut, which resulted in a confrontation with Mom. I still have that vision of Mom coming toward me with the scissors, and no amount of tears would prevent the inevitable chopping off of a couple of inches. I always wanted long braids, but Mom disliked braids.
Girls had all ranges of haircuts from short bobs to long hair down the back. However, we didn’t seem to care about each other’s style. In the early 60s, we stepped into another time where hair styles became more important. My sister went for her first hairdresser appointment when she was in 5th grade and had her hair cut in the famous “page-boy fluff”.
Parenting Styles have Changed
When I became a parent, I read many texts on parenting techniques, and most of the advice suggested to allow children to select their own clothes, both to purchase and to wear. That was surprising to me given that my own childhood experiences that put Mom in charge. I would agree that it is probably is best to allow children to make their own choices. Perhaps, however, allowing those choices might direct the child’s concern about outward appearance, which may not be the place that we want children to focus most of their attention.
Comments on: "1950s Retrospective on Children’s Fashions: Petticoats and Mary Janes" (24)
Kae U made my day loved the blog and photos 🙂 Thanks – hugs – j
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 15:13:59 +0000 To: firstname.lastname@example.org
Went through about thirty boxes of slides looking for the best representations. The slide of us in our school dresses may have been given to us by your father, as the slide cover was totally different, white and black, while all the other slides were red and white. For some reason, the slide had turned red and required fiddling with the color correction. It was a joy to view the pictures again.
Wasn’t it just yesterday?
I remember so many of those outfits. I hated the dresses that were scratchy. It was very important to mom that we looked our best. We had several heated battles in my teenage years. One centered around a leopard head band on a purple felt hat.
Well, maybe I should do a part 2, teenage fashions of the 50s-60s; lots of tensions with parents around long hair and mini-skirts.
So darling, all of those old pics!
Dad took lots of slides back then. We used to set up a projector and have slide shows. Thanks for stopping by.
[…] 1950s Retrospective on Children’s Fashions: Petticoats and Mary Janes […]
[…] wonder about girls playing outside while wearing dresses. Maybe it was a Sunday? In the post, 1950s Retrospective on Children’s Fashion: Petticoats and Mary Janes, I reminisce about what we wore back then. In the second photo just behind Paul, a hand lawn mower […]
Selection of clothing has been a problem for some time, when you take into consideration the impact of Mass Media from the end of the 19th century through the 20th and to the present. Mass media both reflects & shapes values, beliefs & ideologies. From the original Floradora & It Girls to Katy Perry , one can see how fashion & body image were shaped by popular Mass Media icons. Add to this the business interests that have turned Dale Evans cow girl outfits to Disney princesses and wearing logos & brand names as a fashion statement & “expressions of individuality & being part of the group”. Parenting is now even more of a minefield.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, the question remains, are we actually selecting what we want to wear or are we being manipulated by mass media and corporate influences? Does freedom of choice really exist? BTW, enjoyed you post on gendered products, http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2015/01/20/five-reasons-why-pointlessly-gendered-products-are-a-problem/
Insightful post, but that wasn’t me. 😀
You can find me here:
My mother said back in the 60s when the mini & hot pants were the rage that:
a) not new, just revisiting the 1920s
b) why blame the teens for wearing clothing designed, marketed & sold in stores. All of it was run by the adults.
Cheers from Canada. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for the link. Good point about the retailers . . . rarely do capitalists get the blame or the heat.
Very interesting post. In Canada girls had to wear dresses to school as well, even when mini skirts were in style and the temperature was -16°F. I went on my first protest march then, for the right for girls to wear pants to school (1968). We won, but it had to be dress pants. I always thought it was better in the States as in Leave it to Beaver the boys wore jeans. For us women, that was another protest march in 1975, for the right to wear jeans to work when the men were allowed but not the women, and we had messy jobs.
LikeLiked by 1 person
From an early age, I remember questioning why girls had to wear dresses as that policy never made sense to me. My second year of teaching, they changed the policy that women could wear pant suits . . . gradually that morphed into just pants. I guess authorities just couldn’t be bothered policing that dress code. Thanks for sharing your experiences and protest efforts!
Very interesting – thanks for sharing. I had Enid Blytons images running through my head as I read.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Had to Google Enid, which proved interesting since some of her books have been banned. I’ll have to check them out. Thx for commenting. K
Samuel Pepys would be proud. People do not think to record the mundane and yet that is precisely what many historians seek.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ah, Samuel Pepys, wasn’t he the man Gilbert and Sullivan parodied in HMS Pinafore? . . .”stick close to your desk and never go to sea, and you all may be rulers of the Queen’s navy.” Well, thanks for the compliment!
Thank you for the trip back to the days of outfits with aprons, penwipers, twin prints, rick-rack, sashes, pinafores, jumper effects, piping, and appliques; petticoats; and starching and ironing burdens for mothers. And the modern, postwar, easy-care solution: nylon. I have a photo of a birthday party from the mid-1950s, in which almost every girl has a nylon dress, and one boy is sporting a nylon sports shirt. Could not skimp on the underlayers when wearing nylon!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Penwipers! ? Well, we certainly had style vocabulary back then . . . yes, dressing up was quite an effort, which I didn’t always enjoy. Thanks for adding to the discussion. : )
So cute!! I happened to come across your blog and just had to say hi. I grew up around the sme time, early 60s, and also from Philadelphia, actually, Oak Lane (near Cheltenham, now in the DC area) and I do remember dressing up all the time and those pettis and the flouncy look, especially at parties and school, and preserving modesty. Or, trying not to give a show. I also remember around 1970 when I’d have been 12, getting the OK to wear pants to school (seriously). Of course, we then said the boys had to wear dresses . . . Fun times. and, no, I didn’t force my 2 girls into fancy dresses. Stay safe in all the craziness now! Sarabear0011@yahoo.com
Thanks for contributing to outfits of the past. Right, those fancy dresses could be scratchy! Of all my posts, this one gets some of the highest hits, along with the Lone Ranger. I guess these references hark back to now what seems like simpler times. We certainly have stepped into the rabbit hole with Alice. Warm regards, K
I luv your blog, thanks for writing. It relaxing reading and brings back memories, especially now when we all need to relax!
Sara (stuck hone in sunny Calif).
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks, Sara, for your kind comments! This post gets more hits than any of the others.
Best wishes for the New Year! 🎆